m1 abrams model

M1 Abrams Model - The M1 Abrams is a third generation American main battle tank designed by Chrysler Defense (now General Dynamics Land Systems).

And under the name of General Creighton Abrams built a modern ground war. But now one of the largest tanks in service at nearly 68 short tons (about 62 metric tons) has brought several modern technologies to the US armed forces. Many fuel turbines Urban Chobham combined weapons, computers, fire control systems. Separate weapons storage in the explosion compartment and NBC safe crew protection. M1 initial version armed with the licensed 105mm Royal L7 gun. later models have the licensed Rheinmetall 120mm L/44.

M1 Abrams Model

The Abrams M1 was developed from the failure of the MBT-70 project to replace the aging M60 tank, There are three versions of the Abrams for main use: the M1, M1A1 and M1A2, with each new iteration seeing improvements in the field. protection and electronics The most extensive improvements have been made to the latest M1A2 System Package version 3 or SEPv3 and M1A2 SEPv4 respectively, such as the combined weapons. Optical, digital and enhanced protection.

New Release: M1a2 Abrams

Abrams was to replace the XM1202 Future Weapons, but due to the cancellation the US military chose to keep and operate the M1 series in the near future, upgrading it with better sights, weapons and powers.

The M1 Abrams entered service in 1980 and became the US Army's main battle tank. and once exported Marine Corps Versions will be used by the armies of Egypt, Kuwait, Arabia, Australia, Iraq, Abrams for the first time in combat in the Persian War. and fought in US operations in both the Afghan war and the Iraq war. While Iraqi Abrams tanks are being used in the war against IS. and in use in the Saudi Arabian Civil War Yemi

During the 1960s, the German Army and the West German Army worked on a single project that would replace both the M60 and Panther 1 tanks, such as the T-62, providing better protection against the new 115mm hammer guns and especially the High Max. Explosive Anti-Tank (heat) rolling.

For this reason, the design of the MBT-70 incorporates new technologies. At the same time, the hydro-pneumatic suspension provides excellent cross-country ride quality. And it also allows the driver to raise or lower the bucket from the driver. The lowest position was the top of the fuel tank, only 1.8 m above the ground. It was powered by a new 1,500-horsepower, engine class design, both of which could reach speeds of 43 mph (69 km/h). The US 152 mm gun is armed with the first long-range Shillelagh missile, while the Germans design a new 120 mm razor tube.

The Next Generation Abramsx Battle Tank Is An Ai Fueled Hybrid

Although the design is very capable. But the weight was increasing. As with the budget, in 1969, the cost per unit was five times the original estimate. The Ministry of Defense suspended the project

Development of the tank continued in earnest until January 1970, when the Ministry of Defense cooperated with Germany.

Due to problems with the MBT-70, the US Army introduced the XM803, using some of the technology from the MBT-70, but removing some important features. This could only lead to the production of an explosive system similar to the M60.

Congress retired the XM803 in December 1971, but allowed the Army to invest the remaining $20 million to develop a new main battle tank.

Metal Earth Tanks

The Tank-Automotive and Armamts Command (TACOM) began investigating specific targets. After several rounds of entry Arma decided to win. a "serious threat" posed by the T-62's 115 mm guns, using improvements to anticipatory armor plating (APFSDS) during the 1980s and the new 125 mm high-firing guns of the T-64 and T-72. perurbane shells anti-lake (heat).

As a result, a new basic plan appeared in February 1973. The strike was to overcome the Soviet artillery at a distance of 800 meters and 30 degrees on either side. The tank will be armed with a 105 mm M68 gun, a licensed version of the Royal L7 cannon, and a 20 mm version of the M242 Bushmaster.

In May 1973, Chrysler Defse and Gerald Motors made an offer. Both armed with licensed 105 mm M68, L7 and 20 mm Bushmaster cannons. Chrysler chose the 1,500 hp Lycoming AGT1500 gas engine. He chose a GM model with a 1,500 hp diesel, which he liked to use.

Considering the experience of the Yom Kippur War of that year, many changes were made to the design, the "Burlington" armor, recreated from a British army laboratory, was incorporated to improve protection. Especially against the heat and include new weapons. The original plan to keep the weight below 50,000 short tons (45 tons) was scrapped. The Bushmaster was deemed redundant and was removed while TACOM continued to develop its precision system. Initial V prototypes of the weapon system were sent to the Missile Research Laboratory for testing.

Us M1a2 Abrams Main Battle Tank With Tusk Ii (1:72 Scale) — Motor City Classics

At the time, Ptagon's management system was beset by problems arising from the need for an optimal plan. This often resulted in the program being canceled due to cost overruns. I will leave the forces when they escaped the system As in the case of the MBT-70, there was a strong reaction in the military to be able to return it within the budget, so as not to repeat the experience of the MBT-70. for the new project According to the Army the unit cost would not exceed $507,000 in 1972 dollars (equivalent to $3,280,000 in 2021).

Ptagon's approach to regulatory research and development has changed with the XM1. Under the new framework, contractors compete to bid on their plans. instead of competing only to produce the right product d

Computer tools from the Ballistic Research Laboratory (BRL) were used during the development of the M1, which led to the development of BRL-CAD. Here is a General Vector 3D terminal graphic model of the M1.

At the time of the initial prototyping agreement between Germany and the United States of America regarding the use of the 105mm gun, the Army plans to introduce several new types of ammunition 105 that greatly improve its effectiveness. Specifically, the XM-774 is depleted uranium. These rounds will provide the necessary efficiency to easily defeat Soviet tanks. There were concerns that uranium would not be allowed to be imported into Germany. Maybe he's just at peace. Therefore improvements were made to the M735 tungsten core.

M1a2 Abrams 3d Model

At the same time they insist on constant efforts to improve the logistics of NATO to the highest level possible. The Germans advanced with their 120mm guns in the Panther 2K and noted that the British had taken their 120mm guns in a long-range engagement.

In 1977 it was decided to move the new tank to the 120 mm gun after a head-to-head test between the Royal Gun L11A5 and the Rheinmetall Rh-120. The turret design of both prototypes was changed so that both guns were mounted, when the 120 mm L11/M256 cannon was chosen as the main armament of the M1 Abrams in 1979, the turrets were adopted. . As a result, the field was suspended until 1984.

This for two reasons: First, because of the sheer number of M60 tanks with M68E1 guns still in service in the United States of America, and the large arsenal of 105mm guns, an economical and practical solution. This allows the sharing of protection between both types of farms.

A prototype was delivered in 1976 by Chrysler and GM, armed with a license-built 105mm model Royal Gun L7 M68E1. They conducted head-to-head testing at Aberde for a comparison test with the Leopard 2 AV prototype. Leopard 2 was found to meet US specifications. but he thinks that the price is higher

Tamiya Us M1a2 Abrams Tank / Tamiya Usa

Testimony shows GM's design is superior to Chrysler's overall, providing better armor protection. Better fire control and tower stability

These early production prototypes were temporarily armed with the M68E1 105 mm main gun, while 120 mm guns and ammunition were required during the design and development stages of the components. These prototypes used a combination platform that was rated for both 105 mm and 120 mm guns.

In the test Force of both designs proved problems. In an effort to improve fuel efficiency, Chrysler's gas turbines have been brought closer to traditional internal combustion engines. This cannot be proven: the Gine used much more fuel than expected, burning 3.8 liters per mile.

Lego m1 abrams, m1 abrams diecast, m1 abrams scale model, m1 abrams 3d model, best m1 abrams model kit, lego m1 abrams tank, m1 abrams, m1 abrams rc tank, m1 abrams model kit, m1 abrams for sale, tank m1 abrams, m1 abrams tank model